Civil service learning tinder dating site
This is what’s known as The Reward Theory of Attraction – we instinctively prioritize relationships with people who make us feel gratified when we’re around them. However, for many people, sharing your faith with your children is important – and if you disagree on how to raise them, this becomes a ticking timebomb in your happiness. Your snugglebunny may be cool with your being a proud hellbound heathen… Now you’re in the position of having to decide between your entire family and friends…
It’s easy for Laber to snort with derision about how this is “causing people to see an opposing viewpoint as an all-out assault on their personhood”, but is a good start, it’s a little understandable why someone might not want to scramble their DNA with someone who thinks that every sperm is sacred and is willing to back that belief up with legislation. Assortative mating serves to intensify this polarization.
Laber is, indeed, correct that he and his cohorts that women are performing some sort of Lysistrata-esque pork-out against white nationalists and their quislings…
it’s that their refusal to consider conservative boners contributes to increased political polarity.
And with the number of people who are either queer themselves or have LGBTQ friends and family, it’s not unreasonable to prefer to date people who will reaffirm the basic humanity of their loved ones. It amplifies an already significant ingroup-outgroup mentality around contentious social issues.
But while we’re at it: One of the things that’s significant about Laber’s screed is who he’s directing it towards: women. Social and cultural issues create severe disagreement because they trigger the emotional part of the brain: the disagreement challenges a core part of group identity.